CALL FOR PAPERS FOR THE YEAR 2015
Science International is a Multi Disciplinary Journal covering all fields of science.
ISSN 1013-5316 : CODEN : SINTE 8
PUBLISHED BY: Publications International Lahore, Pakistan
11 D, Sabzazar, Wahdat Road, Lahore, Pakistan
INTERNATIONAL SERIAL DATA SYSTEM (ISDS) , ISSN 1013-5316,
Cited and nd abstracted by international agencies far and wide,
CHEMICAL ABSTRACT SERVICE, OHIO, U.S.A.
[CODEN :SINTE 8],
WoS-BIOSIS(data base Zoological Record) U. K.,
H. E. C. Pakistan
Bibliothec Tech. Info. -Germany
with largest spectrum of natural and social sciences
The journal is published both in
PRINT AND ONLINE
Knowledge has no limits and no boundaries for research maniac.
Research terminates at infinity
Though, research in science has assumed immeasurable dimensions with its classification into different fields of study, yet, there are matters of mutual interest to give comprehensive treatment to the subject under investigation. In surmounting the problems in respective areas, one invariably is forced to encroach other disciplines. There are number of instances of joint ventures, involving scientists from divergent fields of study, to develop consensus to conclude. In the strict sense, research at top levels has resisted to be colonized. For example,
Study in genetics, has impact on a number of physical and biological sciences.
Research in crystallography has been a subject of mutual interest of physicists, chemists and chemical engineers etc. alike.
Computer simulation is matter of universal interest.
Environmental studies has motivated almost all the sectors of science to share responsibilities in the wake of growing pollution.
The kind of forum, thus, contemplated by the science international is aimed at providing common room for scientists from various fields of pure and applied sciences for direct communication to share their knowledge. The cross breeding of ideas certainly helps in the exploration of new avenues in the world of science.
Countering the Internet Propaganda Against MHT
A Message from Academics—A Call to the Merited Cognizance
It is less often that a certain academic commencement made by some Pakistani makes all of us uprightly elevated as the ground breaking discovery of MHT and its first demonstration makes identically. But, contrarily some naïve chaps have launched an obnoxious propaganda campaign on the internet to pollute the layman public opinion on pretty narrow grounds.
Please have an insight into the subject-matter in order to evaluate the issue’s ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ on a meritorious way—by means of intellectual honesty.
Professor Emeritus Dr. Zaki (COMSATS), Prof. Dr. Khalida M. Khan (University of the Punjab), Prof. Dr. Umar Farooq (DUHS), Lt. Col. (R) Azhar Saleem (SAARC Academia), Dr. F. M. Bhatti (MAVSO Intl.), Dr. Narmeen Gohar (Mayo Hospital), Dr. Rabia Faridi (USA), Dr. Salawal Salah (New Zealand), Dr. E. M. Nawaratne (Sri Lanka)
On the discovery of Magneto- Hydro-Tropism (MHT), an interdisciplinary panel discussion was conducted on 22nd July, 2016 in the Centre for Integrated Mountain Research, University of the Punjab, Lahore, experts of different disciplines posed different questions on the MHT discoverer, Prof, Dr. Aurangzeb Al Hafi. All of the technical questions posed during the session, were addressed properly. MHT was learnt as a breakthrough discovery that has brought a feather in the cap of Pakistani academia and helped to fetch Pakistan’s a softer image in the world. Similarly it was concluded by the quorum consensus to answer and counter the propaganda campaign against the MHT discovery. The said agenda was endorsed by the undermentioned academics.
Dr. Khalida Khan, (CIMR-PU), Prof. Dr. Humala S. Khalid (Ex Dean, LCWU), Prof. Dr. Zaki Ahmad Professor Emeritus, Adjunct Prof. (COMSAT), Prof. Dr. Azam Sheikh (Sci. Int.), Prof. Dr. C. M. Ashraf (Rep., Royal Society of Chemistry, UK), Prof. Dr. M. Aurangzeb Hafi, (MHT-Discoverer), Muhammad Ikram (NIRSG), Dr. Muhammad Ashraf Bodla (MMP- Lahore), Representative (UET, Lahore) Mr. Mahr Sahibzad Khan (RMC, Lahore), Engr. Muhammad Yaseen (CIMR)
Discovery of Magneto-hydro-tropism (MHT) — A Question Mark on Academia’s Face or A Test Case for the Intellectual Honesty Essentials—Media Rumors, Communal Divergences or Utilitarian Prejudices?— An Analytical Review.
By: S. S. Paru L. L. D.
In the last two weeks’ course of events, an eccentric and strange wave of suspicion has been outlandishly aroused and stirred on different websites and news outlets, which more or less is all about assessing the ‘worth’ or ‘paltriness’ of an experiment conducted by a team of Pakistani scientists, who claimed a major ‘breakthrough discovery’ in the domains of basic as well as applied sciences.
Reportedly, besides international scientific observing from UK and USA via satellite, the demonstration’s on ground observing panel consisted of inter-disciplinary experts from different institutions of Pakistani national academia.
Some of the findings were disclosed to an assorted and pluralist audience-ship who attended the event. As one would expect, quite naturally, neither all of the specifics were disclosed to media, nor were all of the technical peculiarities likely to be made public. Some of the methodical and certain systematic details were reported to the academics at the termination of the MHT trialing event.
The Matter of Fact:
Nothing new in the scientific history and no strange to the intellectual course of scrutiny, the discovery of MHT was not an exception. Correspondingly, it also had to proceed through the same sequence and series of academic enquiries, as required for the similar propositions, theories or concepts to qualify for becoming a ‘scientific law’. But here in the case of MHT, as a matter of fact, quite conversely to the intellectual norms, nothing out of the scientific ‘course of happenings’ was made opted or tolerated to happen, in order to let the discovery proceed through the ‘academic judgments’.
Academic Judgments and the Enquiry Premise:
The academic judgments of measuring the significance of a particular scientific achievement always follow the austere and authoritative premise of scholastic enquiry. And if the process of affirming or negating the achievement is based on intellectual parameters, it necessitates and compels to follow that scholastic premise which comprises of certain intellectual assessment fundamentals;
1-Priori Considerations 2-Definitional Approaches 3-Methodological Concerns 4-Procedural Means
5-Scope Loci 6-Technical Contentions 7-Applicational Measures 8-Implicational Apprehensions
9-Practical Prospects 10-Forensic Cautions
Sadly, not even a single rule of academic judgment was adopted or considered as mandatory to make an acceptable condemnation of MHT. Instead of tolerating it for a certain timeframe or allocating a ‘normal time’ required for a concept to be accepted or rejected in its natural course of action, the proposition along with the experiment’s findings were thrown as something perceived or considered as a moral and mortal ‘transgression’.
Consequently, on its very onset, the discovery of MHT became heavily rumored as an ‘object of prey’ in its infantile stages. Rumors-hunting is not a new habit for the skeptics of the subcontinent region, who use to borrow their concepts from internet propaganda by day and night.
Even though it was very clearly mentioned in the said claims that it is a novel idea, and subsequently the terms too, however the naïve critiques didn’t hesitate to opine like: “Interestingly, the terms such as “Magneto-Hydro-Tropism” and “Magneto Kinetics” do not even exist, the latter doesn’t even have anything to do with pregnancy or life sciences.
The Choice-A Healthy Criticism or an Abusive Approach?
Healthy criticisms always produce healthy atmospheres, especially in the case of scientific advancements, but the abusive style of criticism and denunciation adopted thereupon (in this particular case of MHT’s discoverer and the discovery itself), has essentially purveyed an impertinent and detrimentally damaging situation not only for MHT, but also for an abundant profusion of novel concepts and innovative thoughts, that could be accumulated vis-à-vis the field. Instead of coming up with certain technical contentions, methodical concerns or procedural charges, almost all of the critiquing accounts on MHT are entirely far away from any logical germaneness and honestly speaking, no-more-nothing-less than ‘mere nitpickings’ of the discoverer i.e. Prof. Aurangzeb Al-Hafi. In addition, during the course of nitpicking and disparaging the person under consideration, an obscure and pedantic arrogance remains awesomely dominant and overwhelmingly visible, virtually in the whole versions of ‘commenting on’ for the sake of ‘commenting on’.
Furthermore, for all intents and purposes, the ‘hypercritical’ and offensive style adopted for denunciation have, in effect, triggered and incited a hatred revulsion and a sense of animosity in those obsessed and mania riddled people of Pakistan who are ready to eliminate, liquidate or even assassinate ‘anyone’ for ‘any reason’— being absolutely regardless of whether justifiable or not!
The Level and Language of Criticism:
The naïve critiquing accounts framed as such ‘fraud’ ‘fake experimentation’ by ‘fake scientist’ etc. means what? What type of fraud? What is meant by the fakeness in experimentation? What ‘type’ of fakeness or what kind of ‘fraud’ can be entrenched in conducting an experiment on a rabbit? Some of the critiques have even gone to the extents of criticizing the act of carrying the rabbit to air in the plane….One may scratch his head by enquiring “Is there any ransom involved in carrying a rabbit to air—and consequently the entire species would have to pay it to Prof. Hafi…? What an absurd format of criticism is it?
Almost everyone fingering the person under question (the discoverer of MHT), hasn’t forgotten to indicate that the person under discussion is carrying out such ‘frauds’ for at least over last 15 years. Plotting a ‘fraud’ to achieve what? What are the motives of carrying out such deeds? What is the purpose of maneuvering such schema-designs? Has he ever got a funding from the Government after such cumbersome and hefty exercise? Are there some commercial purposes behind all this—and, if this be the case then a 15 years of timespan is enough to scratch the drapes or ‘motives behind’.
Since the opponents and criticizers have become extraordinarily personal on Prof Al Hafi’s account, I had to be so in digging a deeper.
In fact the person under consideration is not in harmony with numerous local as well as international organizational setting-ups. Since, by compositions and dispositions this man is an extremely humane-hearted being and a loyalist and strict stalwart of morality rectitude, he usually remains ‘unfit’ in the typical organizational atmospheres of Pakistan.
As per a ‘detached’ observation and the objective measures employed for an honest and impartial finding, it remains incontestable that he is a person of his own kind who holds fast his personal convictions with an occasionally tested indomitable conviction, consistently determined towards striving for symbolizing a better and softer image of Pakistan on the face of diverse spheres, at different levels—conducting different projects for the poor disabled victims of Tsunami at one juncture and doing research for pre-birth disability causes on another instance, trying to ban the teratogens in the weird circumstances of the least developed countries of Asia, Africa and the world’s other poor populations.
The Outcome Finding:
Systematically viewed through the chains of scrutiny for the said undertakings of over 15 years, one can easily find in a fair enough way that none of the events divulges any nefarious design or despicable appalling behind, so far.
Prior to writing this article, I’ve tried unto my utmost levels in order to find any sound technical objection on MHT or some acceptable enough ethical or moral charges on its discoverer, but after a careful content analysis of the stuff available on the issue, I had been failed to find any contentious piece of the discontentment. What I’d been able to see, has nothing to do with scholarly critique accounts, instead it is all about pinpointing or rather ‘skepticizing’ and then disgracing the conductor and the experiment itself.
However, besides all, I would like to express my feelings for all Pakistanis here and in Pakistan that: nonetheless swirled around and riddled up by heavy controversies and polemic storms, the under-grown and over-thrown discovery of MHT holds the potentials to pave its way for opening new pragmatic vistas, conjectural visions and perspective developments in the disciplines of relevance. I do hope that MHT discovery would bring a real new-age-climax to the scientific world, thus fetching Pakistan’s name as the pioneering country in an innovative scientific field, for the centuries to come.
Related Links: http://mhtdiscovery.org/